Model profile
Meta

Meta: Llama 4 Scout

Meta: Llama 4 Scout is a budget-priced multimodal generalist from Meta with fast runtime profile, large context posture, and the clearest fit around long-context research / multimodal.

Best for: Long-context research / MultimodalFast latencyLarge contextBudget pricing
Intelligence
13.5

Benchmark blend

Coding
6.7

Dev workflow signal

Context
328K Tokens

Large

Input Price
$0.17

Budget tier

Decision snapshot
51

Meta: Llama 4 Scout currently reads as a budget multimodal option with large context and a fast runtime profile.

Overall profile
Use-case specific
Best for
Long-context research / Multimodal
Latency tier
Fast
Price tier
Budget
Source coverage
OpenRouterArtificial AnalysisVision signal

Decision Strip

Decision rail before the raw tables

Core buy-side signals stay in one pass. The rest of the page expands only after intelligence, speed, context, and price are clear.

Intelligence
13.5
14

General reasoning and benchmark headroom.

Limited
Speed
140 tok/s
98

TTFT 0.47s

Above average
Context
328K Tokens
88

How much prompt and task state can stay in view.

Above average
Price
$0.17
86

$0.66 output / 1M

Efficient

Editorial Profile

Meta: Llama 4 Scout in one narrative

Positioning, tradeoffs, and fit are consolidated into one read instead of repeating the same story across separate cards.

Use-case specificCoding score 7Math score 14Vision enabled

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct (16E) is a mixture-of-experts (MoE) language model developed by Meta, activating 17 billion parameters out of a total of 109B. It supports native multimodal input...

Identity

Meta multimodal profile

Positioning

Long-context research / Multimodal with large context and fast runtime.

Cost posture

Efficient spend profile. More comfortable for sustained prompt volume if the capability fit is right.

Strengths
  • Large context headroom supports repo-wide prompts and long research sessions.

  • Vision-capable routing opens up multimodal review and extraction workflows.

  • Latency and throughput look responsive enough for interactive loops.

Tradeoffs
  • Budget-friendly input pricing is a strength, but raw capability may vary by workload.

Best fit
  • Image-grounded review, multimodal extraction, and UI audit workflows.

  • Long-context summarization, repo analysis, and policy or document review.

Explore Next

Similar profiles worth opening next

Meta

Muse Spark

Intelligence
52.1
Context
N/A
Input Price
$0.00
Meta

Meta: Llama 4 Maverick

Intelligence
18.4
Context
1049K Tokens
Input Price
$0.31
Meta

Llama 3.1 Instruct 405B

Intelligence
17.4
Context
N/A
Input Price
$2.75

Benchmarks

Grouped by job-to-be-done

Only benchmark categories with actual signal are shown. Secondary values stay as simple definitions instead of nested micro-cards.

General intelligence

Broad reasoning, knowledge depth, and flagship benchmark posture.

Intelligence Index
13.5
MMLU Pro
75.2%
GPQA
58.7%
HLE
4.3%
Coding

Software implementation, debugging quality, and coding benchmark signal.

Coding Index
6.7
LiveCodeBench
0.299
SciCode
17.0%
Math

Formal reasoning, structured problem solving, and competition-style math.

Math Index
14.0
AIME
28.3%
AIME 2025
14.0%
Math 500
84.4%
Agent / tool use

Long-horizon execution quality and interactive benchmark evidence.

IFBench
39.5%
TAU2
15.5%
TerminalBench Hard
1.5%
LCR
25.8%

Specs & Pricing

Technical snapshot and cost posture

Specs stay neutral, pricing gets emphasis through values rather than extra containers. Raw provider internals remain in metadata at the end.

Technical snapshot
Context Window
328K Tokens
Vision
Enabled
Modalities
image, text
Tokenizer
Llama4
Max Completion
16384
Moderation
No
Supported Parameters
frequency_penaltymax_tokensmin_ppresence_penaltyrepetition_penaltyresponse_formatseedstopstructured_outputstemperaturetool_choicetoolstop_ktop_p
Input Modalities
imagetext
Output Modalities
text
Price architecture
Input
per 1M input tokens
$0.17
Output
per 1M output tokens
$0.66
Blended
AA 3:1 mix
$0.29

This model is relatively efficient on price. It is the easier fit when sustained prompt volume matters.

Metadata

Raw source tables at the end

Verification details remain available, but the page no longer forces them ahead of the editorial read.