Model profile
Meta

Meta: Llama 4 Maverick

Meta: Llama 4 Maverick is a budget-priced multimodal generalist from Meta with fast runtime profile, large context posture, and the clearest fit around long-context research / multimodal.

Best for: Long-context research / MultimodalFast latencyLarge contextBudget pricing
Intelligence
18.4

Benchmark blend

Coding
15.6

Dev workflow signal

Context
1049K Tokens

Large

Input Price
$0.31

Budget tier

Decision snapshot
54

Meta: Llama 4 Maverick currently reads as a budget multimodal option with large context and a fast runtime profile.

Overall profile
Use-case specific
Best for
Long-context research / Multimodal
Latency tier
Fast
Price tier
Budget
Source coverage
OpenRouterArtificial AnalysisVision signal

Decision Strip

Decision rail before the raw tables

Core buy-side signals stay in one pass. The rest of the page expands only after intelligence, speed, context, and price are clear.

Intelligence
18.4
18

General reasoning and benchmark headroom.

Limited
Speed
104 tok/s
86

TTFT 0.46s

Above average
Context
1049K Tokens
100

How much prompt and task state can stay in view.

Above average
Price
$0.31
86

$0.91 output / 1M

Efficient

Editorial Profile

Meta: Llama 4 Maverick in one narrative

Positioning, tradeoffs, and fit are consolidated into one read instead of repeating the same story across separate cards.

Use-case specificCoding score 16Math score 19Vision enabled

Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct (128E) is a high-capacity multimodal language model from Meta, built on a mixture-of-experts (MoE) architecture with 128 experts and 17 billion active parameters per forward...

Identity

Meta multimodal profile

Positioning

Long-context research / Multimodal with large context and fast runtime.

Cost posture

Efficient spend profile. More comfortable for sustained prompt volume if the capability fit is right.

Strengths
  • Large context headroom supports repo-wide prompts and long research sessions.

  • Vision-capable routing opens up multimodal review and extraction workflows.

  • Latency and throughput look responsive enough for interactive loops.

Tradeoffs
  • Budget-friendly input pricing is a strength, but raw capability may vary by workload.

Best fit
  • Image-grounded review, multimodal extraction, and UI audit workflows.

  • Long-context summarization, repo analysis, and policy or document review.

Explore Next

Similar profiles worth opening next

Meta

Muse Spark

Intelligence
52.1
Context
N/A
Input Price
$0.00
Meta

Llama 3.1 Instruct 405B

Intelligence
17.4
Context
N/A
Input Price
$2.75
Meta

Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B

Intelligence
14.5
Context
N/A
Input Price
$0.58

Benchmarks

Grouped by job-to-be-done

Only benchmark categories with actual signal are shown. Secondary values stay as simple definitions instead of nested micro-cards.

General intelligence

Broad reasoning, knowledge depth, and flagship benchmark posture.

Intelligence Index
18.4
MMLU Pro
80.9%
GPQA
67.1%
HLE
4.8%
Coding

Software implementation, debugging quality, and coding benchmark signal.

Coding Index
15.6
LiveCodeBench
0.397
SciCode
33.1%
Math

Formal reasoning, structured problem solving, and competition-style math.

Math Index
19.3
AIME
39.0%
AIME 2025
19.3%
Math 500
88.9%
Agent / tool use

Long-horizon execution quality and interactive benchmark evidence.

IFBench
43.0%
TAU2
17.8%
TerminalBench Hard
6.8%
LCR
46.0%

Specs & Pricing

Technical snapshot and cost posture

Specs stay neutral, pricing gets emphasis through values rather than extra containers. Raw provider internals remain in metadata at the end.

Technical snapshot
Context Window
1049K Tokens
Vision
Enabled
Modalities
image, text
Tokenizer
Llama4
Max Completion
16384
Moderation
No
Supported Parameters
frequency_penaltylogit_biasmax_tokensmin_ppresence_penaltyrepetition_penaltyresponse_formatseedstopstructured_outputstemperaturetool_choicetoolstop_ktop_p
Input Modalities
imagetext
Output Modalities
text
Price architecture
Input
per 1M input tokens
$0.31
Output
per 1M output tokens
$0.91
Blended
AA 3:1 mix
$0.49

This model is relatively efficient on price. It is the easier fit when sustained prompt volume matters.

Metadata

Raw source tables at the end

Verification details remain available, but the page no longer forces them ahead of the editorial read.