Model profile
z-ai

Z.ai: GLM 4.6

Z.ai: GLM 4.6 is a budget text-first model from z-ai with a fast runtime profile, large context posture, and the clearest fit around long-context research / agent workflows.

Best for: Long-context research / Agent workflowsFast latencyLarge contextBudget pricing
Intelligence
30.2

Benchmark blend

Coding
30.2

Dev workflow signal

Context
205K Tokens

Large

Input Price
$0.60

Budget tier

Decision snapshot
57

Z.ai: GLM 4.6 currently reads as a budget text-first option with large context and a fast runtime profile.

Overall profile
Selective fit
Best for
Long-context research / Agent workflows
Latency tier
Fast
Price tier
Budget
Source coverage
OpenRouterArtificial Analysis

Decision Strip

Decision rail before the raw tables

Core buy-side signals stay in one pass. The rest of the page expands only after intelligence, speed, context, and price are clear.

Intelligence
30.2
30

General reasoning and benchmark headroom.

Limited
Speed
91 tok/s
78

TTFT 0.64s

Above average
Context
205K Tokens
88

How much prompt and task state can stay in view.

Above average
Price
$0.60
86

$2.20 output / 1M

Efficient

Editorial Profile

Z.ai: GLM 4.6 in one narrative

Positioning, tradeoffs, and fit are consolidated into one read instead of repeating the same story across separate cards.

Selective fitCoding score 30Math score 44

Compared with GLM-4.5, this generation brings several key improvements: Longer context window: The context window has been expanded from 128K to 200K tokens, enabling the model to handle more complex agentic tasks. Superior coding performance: The model achieves higher scores on code benchmarks and demonstrates better real-world performance in applications such as Claude Code、Cline、Roo Code and Kilo Code, including improvements in generating visually polished front-end pages. Advanced reasoning: GLM-4.6 shows a clear improvement in reasoning performance and supports tool use during inference, leading to stronger overall capability. More capable agents: GLM-4.6 exhibits stronger performance in tool using and search-based agents, and integrates more effectively within agent frameworks. Refined writing: Better aligns with human preferences in style and readability, and performs more naturally in role-playing scenarios.

Identity

z-ai text-first profile

Positioning

Long-context research / Agent workflows with large context and fast runtime.

Cost posture

Efficient spend profile. More comfortable for sustained prompt volume if the capability fit is right.

Strengths
  • Large context headroom supports repo-wide prompts and long research sessions.

  • Latency and throughput look responsive enough for interactive loops.

Tradeoffs
  • Budget-friendly input pricing is a strength, but raw capability may vary by workload.

  • Current metadata points to a text-first profile rather than a broad multimodal one.

Best fit
  • Long-context summarization, repo analysis, and policy or document review.

Compare Next

Similar profiles worth opening next

z-ai

Z.ai: GLM 4.7

Intelligence
42.1
Context
203K Tokens
Input Price
$0.60
z-ai

Z.ai: GLM 5

Intelligence
40.6
Context
203K Tokens
Input Price
$1.00
z-ai

Z.ai: GLM 4.5

Intelligence
26.4
Context
131K Tokens
Input Price
$0.49

Benchmarks

Grouped by job-to-be-done

Only benchmark categories with actual signal are shown. Secondary values stay as simple definitions instead of nested micro-cards.

General intelligence

Broad reasoning, knowledge depth, and flagship benchmark posture.

Intelligence Index
30.2
MMLU Pro
78.4%
GPQA
63.2%
HLE
5.2%
Coding

Software implementation, debugging quality, and coding benchmark signal.

Coding Index
30.2
LiveCodeBench
0.561
SciCode
33.1%
Math

Formal reasoning, structured problem solving, and competition-style math.

Math Index
44.3
AIME 2025
44.3%
Agent / tool use

Long-horizon execution quality and interactive benchmark evidence.

IFBench
36.7%
TAU2
76.9%
TerminalBench Hard
28.8%
LCR
26.3%

Specs & Pricing

Technical snapshot and cost posture

Specs stay neutral, pricing gets emphasis through values rather than extra containers. Raw provider internals remain in metadata at the end.

Technical snapshot
Context Window
205K Tokens
Vision
Text-first
Modalities
text->text, text
Tokenizer
Other
Max Completion
204800
Moderation
No
Supported Parameters
frequency_penaltyinclude_reasoninglogit_biasmax_tokensmin_ppresence_penaltyreasoningrepetition_penaltyresponse_formatseedstopstructured_outputstemperaturetool_choicetoolstop_ktop_p
Input Modalities
text
Output Modalities
text
Price architecture
Input
per 1M input tokens
$0.60
Output
per 1M output tokens
$2.20
Blended
AA 3:1 mix
$1.00

This model is relatively efficient on price. It is the easier fit when sustained prompt volume matters.

Metadata

Raw source tables at the end

Verification details remain available, but the page no longer forces them ahead of the editorial read.