Model profile
Perplexity

Perplexity: Sonar

Perplexity: Sonar is a budget-priced multimodal generalist from Perplexity with partial runtime data, standard context posture, and the clearest fit around multimodal / long-context research.

Best for: Multimodal / Long-context researchN/A latencyStandard contextBudget pricing
Intelligence
15.5

Benchmark blend

Coding
0.295

Dev workflow signal

Context
127K Tokens

Standard

Input Price
$0.00

Budget tier

Decision snapshot
41

Perplexity: Sonar currently reads as a budget multimodal option with standard context and a partially published runtime profile.

Overall profile
Use-case specific
Best for
Multimodal / Long-context research
Latency tier
N/A
Price tier
Budget
Source coverage
OpenRouterArtificial AnalysisVision signal

Decision Strip

Decision rail before the raw tables

Core buy-side signals stay in one pass. The rest of the page expands only after intelligence, speed, context, and price are clear.

Intelligence
15.5
16

General reasoning and benchmark headroom.

Limited
Speed
N/A
N/A

Latency data is partial.

Unavailable
Context
127K Tokens
64

How much prompt and task state can stay in view.

Competitive
Price
$0.00
86

$0.00 output / 1M

Efficient

Editorial Profile

Perplexity: Sonar in one narrative

Positioning, tradeoffs, and fit are consolidated into one read instead of repeating the same story across separate cards.

Use-case specificCoding score 30Math score 82Vision enabled

Sonar is lightweight, affordable, fast, and simple to use — now featuring citations and the ability to customize sources. It is designed for companies seeking to integrate lightweight question-and-answer features...

Identity

Perplexity multimodal profile

Positioning

Multimodal / Long-context research with standard context and partially published runtime.

Cost posture

Efficient spend profile. More comfortable for sustained prompt volume if the capability fit is right.

Strengths
  • Vision-capable routing opens up multimodal review and extraction workflows.

Tradeoffs
  • Budget-friendly input pricing is a strength, but raw capability may vary by workload.

  • Latency data is incomplete, so interactive responsiveness is harder to rank confidently.

  • Context window is more comfortable for focused tasks than extremely long sessions.

Best fit
  • Image-grounded review, multimodal extraction, and UI audit workflows.

Explore Next

Similar profiles worth opening next

Perplexity

Perplexity: Sonar Reasoning Pro

Intelligence
24.6
Context
128K Tokens
Input Price
$0.00
Perplexity

Sonar Reasoning

Intelligence
17.9
Context
N/A
Input Price
$0.00
Perplexity

Perplexity: Sonar Pro

Intelligence
15.2
Context
200K Tokens
Input Price
$0.00

Benchmarks

Grouped by job-to-be-done

Only benchmark categories with actual signal are shown. Secondary values stay as simple definitions instead of nested micro-cards.

General intelligence

Broad reasoning, knowledge depth, and flagship benchmark posture.

Intelligence Index
15.5
MMLU Pro
68.9%
GPQA
47.1%
HLE
7.3%
Coding

Software implementation, debugging quality, and coding benchmark signal.

LiveCodeBench
0.295
SciCode
22.9%
Math

Formal reasoning, structured problem solving, and competition-style math.

AIME
48.7%
Math 500
81.7%

Specs & Pricing

Technical snapshot and cost posture

Specs stay neutral, pricing gets emphasis through values rather than extra containers. Raw provider internals remain in metadata at the end.

Technical snapshot
Context Window
127K Tokens
Vision
Enabled
Modalities
image, text
Tokenizer
Other
Moderation
No
Supported Parameters
frequency_penaltymax_tokenspresence_penaltytemperaturetop_ktop_pweb_search_options
Input Modalities
imagetext
Output Modalities
text
Price architecture
Input
per 1M input tokens
$0.00
Output
per 1M output tokens
$0.00
Blended
AA 3:1 mix
$0.00

This model is relatively efficient on price. It is the easier fit when sustained prompt volume matters.

OR Web Search Price
$0.0050

Metadata

Raw source tables at the end

Verification details remain available, but the page no longer forces them ahead of the editorial read.