Model profile
OpenAI

OpenAI: o3 Mini High

OpenAI: o3 Mini High is a budget-priced text-first model from OpenAI with heavy runtime profile, large context posture, and the clearest fit around long-context research / agent workflows.

Best for: Long-context research / Agent workflowsHeavy latencyLarge contextBudget pricing
Intelligence
25.2

Benchmark blend

Coding
17.3

Dev workflow signal

Context
200K Tokens

Large

Input Price
$1.10

Budget tier

Decision snapshot
48

OpenAI: o3 Mini High currently reads as a budget text-first option with large context and a heavy runtime profile.

Overall profile
Use-case specific
Best for
Long-context research / Agent workflows
Latency tier
Heavy
Price tier
Budget
Source coverage
OpenRouterArtificial Analysis

Decision Strip

Decision rail before the raw tables

Core buy-side signals stay in one pass. The rest of the page expands only after intelligence, speed, context, and price are clear.

Intelligence
25.2
25

General reasoning and benchmark headroom.

Limited
Speed
149 tok/s
50

TTFT 24.57s

Situational
Context
200K Tokens
88

How much prompt and task state can stay in view.

Above average
Price
$1.10
86

$4.40 output / 1M

Efficient

Editorial Profile

OpenAI: o3 Mini High in one narrative

Positioning, tradeoffs, and fit are consolidated into one read instead of repeating the same story across separate cards.

Use-case specificCoding score 17Math score 99

OpenAI o3-mini-high is the same model as [o3-mini](/openai/o3-mini) with reasoning_effort set to high. o3-mini is a cost-efficient language model optimized for STEM reasoning tasks, particularly excelling in science, mathematics, and...

Identity

OpenAI text-first profile

Positioning

Long-context research / Agent workflows with large context and heavy runtime.

Cost posture

Efficient spend profile. More comfortable for sustained prompt volume if the capability fit is right.

Strengths
  • Large context headroom supports repo-wide prompts and long research sessions.

Tradeoffs
  • Budget-friendly input pricing is a strength, but raw capability may vary by workload.

  • Latency profile is better for deliberate runs than rapid back-and-forth chat.

  • Current metadata points to a text-first profile rather than a broad multimodal one.

Best fit
  • Long-context summarization, repo analysis, and policy or document review.

Explore Next

Similar profiles worth opening next

OpenAI

GPT-5.4 (xhigh)

Intelligence
57.2
Context
N/A
Input Price
$2.50
OpenAI

OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex

Intelligence
54.0
Context
400K Tokens
Input Price
$1.75
OpenAI

GPT-5.2 (xhigh)

Intelligence
51.3
Context
N/A
Input Price
$1.75

Benchmarks

Grouped by job-to-be-done

Only benchmark categories with actual signal are shown. Secondary values stay as simple definitions instead of nested micro-cards.

General intelligence

Broad reasoning, knowledge depth, and flagship benchmark posture.

Intelligence Index
25.2
MMLU Pro
80.2%
GPQA
77.3%
HLE
12.3%
Coding

Software implementation, debugging quality, and coding benchmark signal.

Coding Index
17.3
LiveCodeBench
0.734
SciCode
39.8%
Math

Formal reasoning, structured problem solving, and competition-style math.

AIME
86.0%
Math 500
98.5%
Agent / tool use

Long-horizon execution quality and interactive benchmark evidence.

IFBench
67.1%
TAU2
31.3%
TerminalBench Hard
6.1%
LCR
39.3%

Specs & Pricing

Technical snapshot and cost posture

Specs stay neutral, pricing gets emphasis through values rather than extra containers. Raw provider internals remain in metadata at the end.

Technical snapshot
Context Window
200K Tokens
Vision
Text-first
Modalities
file, text
Tokenizer
GPT
Max Completion
100000
Moderation
Yes
Supported Parameters
include_reasoningmax_tokensreasoningresponse_formatseedstructured_outputstool_choicetools
Input Modalities
filetext
Output Modalities
text
Price architecture
Input
per 1M input tokens
$1.10
Output
per 1M output tokens
$4.40
Blended
AA 3:1 mix
$1.93

This model is relatively efficient on price. It is the easier fit when sustained prompt volume matters.

OR Cache Read
$0.00

Metadata

Raw source tables at the end

Verification details remain available, but the page no longer forces them ahead of the editorial read.