Model profile
nvidia

NVIDIA: Nemotron Nano 9B V2

NVIDIA: Nemotron Nano 9B V2 is a budget text-first model from nvidia with a fast runtime profile, extended context posture, and the clearest fit around long-context research / multimodal.

Best for: Long-context research / MultimodalFast latencyExtended contextBudget pricing
Intelligence
14.8

Benchmark blend

Coding
7.5

Dev workflow signal

Context
131K Tokens

Extended

Input Price
$0.04

Budget tier

Decision snapshot
48

NVIDIA: Nemotron Nano 9B V2 currently reads as a budget text-first option with extended context and a fast runtime profile.

Overall profile
Use-case specific
Best for
Long-context research / Multimodal
Latency tier
Fast
Price tier
Budget
Source coverage
OpenRouterArtificial Analysis

Decision Strip

Decision rail before the raw tables

Core buy-side signals stay in one pass. The rest of the page expands only after intelligence, speed, context, and price are clear.

Intelligence
14.8
15

General reasoning and benchmark headroom.

Limited
Speed
116 tok/s
90

TTFT 0.44s

Above average
Context
131K Tokens
76

How much prompt and task state can stay in view.

Competitive
Price
$0.04
86

$0.16 output / 1M

Efficient

Editorial Profile

NVIDIA: Nemotron Nano 9B V2 in one narrative

Positioning, tradeoffs, and fit are consolidated into one read instead of repeating the same story across separate cards.

Use-case specificCoding score 8Math score 62

NVIDIA-Nemotron-Nano-9B-v2 is a large language model (LLM) trained from scratch by NVIDIA, and designed as a unified model for both reasoning and non-reasoning tasks. It responds to user queries and tasks by first generating a reasoning trace and then concluding with a final response. The model's reasoning capabilities can be controlled via a system prompt. If the user prefers the model to provide its final answer without intermediate reasoning traces, it can be configured to do so.

Identity

nvidia text-first profile

Positioning

Long-context research / Multimodal with extended context and fast runtime.

Cost posture

Efficient spend profile. More comfortable for sustained prompt volume if the capability fit is right.

Strengths
  • Large context headroom supports repo-wide prompts and long research sessions.

  • Latency and throughput look responsive enough for interactive loops.

Tradeoffs
  • Budget-friendly input pricing is a strength, but raw capability may vary by workload.

  • Current metadata points to a text-first profile rather than a broad multimodal one.

Best fit
  • Long-context summarization, repo analysis, and policy or document review.

Compare Next

Similar profiles worth opening next

nvidia

NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

Intelligence
24.3
Context
262K Tokens
Input Price
$0.06
nvidia

NVIDIA: Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL

Intelligence
10.1
Context
131K Tokens
Input Price
$0.20
nvidia

NVIDIA: Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5

Intelligence
N/A
Context
131K Tokens
Input Price
$0.10

Benchmarks

Grouped by job-to-be-done

Only benchmark categories with actual signal are shown. Secondary values stay as simple definitions instead of nested micro-cards.

General intelligence

Broad reasoning, knowledge depth, and flagship benchmark posture.

Intelligence Index
14.8
MMLU Pro
74.2%
GPQA
57.0%
HLE
4.0%
Coding

Software implementation, debugging quality, and coding benchmark signal.

Coding Index
7.5
LiveCodeBench
0.701
SciCode
20.9%
Math

Formal reasoning, structured problem solving, and competition-style math.

Math Index
62.3
AIME 2025
62.3%
Agent / tool use

Long-horizon execution quality and interactive benchmark evidence.

IFBench
27.1%
TAU2
23.4%
TerminalBench Hard
0.8%
LCR
22.7%

Specs & Pricing

Technical snapshot and cost posture

Specs stay neutral, pricing gets emphasis through values rather than extra containers. Raw provider internals remain in metadata at the end.

Technical snapshot
Context Window
131K Tokens
Vision
Text-first
Modalities
text->text
Price architecture
Input
per 1M input tokens
$0.04
Output
per 1M output tokens
$0.16
Blended
AA 3:1 mix
$0.10

This model is relatively efficient on price. It is the easier fit when sustained prompt volume matters.

Metadata

Raw source tables at the end

Verification details remain available, but the page no longer forces them ahead of the editorial read.