Model profile
nvidia

NVIDIA: Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5

NVIDIA: Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 is a budget text-first model from nvidia with a heavy runtime profile, extended context posture, and the clearest fit around long-context research / reasoning.

Best for: Long-context research / ReasoningHeavy latencyExtended contextBudget pricing
Intelligence
N/A

Benchmark blend

Coding
N/A

Dev workflow signal

Context
131K Tokens

Extended

Input Price
$0.10

Budget tier

Decision snapshot
56

NVIDIA: Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 currently reads as a budget text-first option with extended context and a heavy runtime profile.

Overall profile
Selective fit
Best for
Long-context research / Reasoning
Latency tier
Heavy
Price tier
Budget
Source coverage
OpenRouter

Decision Strip

Decision rail before the raw tables

Core buy-side signals stay in one pass. The rest of the page expands only after intelligence, speed, context, and price are clear.

Intelligence
N/A
44

General reasoning and benchmark headroom.

Situational
Speed
N/A
46

Latency data is partial.

Situational
Context
131K Tokens
76

How much prompt and task state can stay in view.

Competitive
Price
$0.10
86

$0.40 output / 1M

Efficient

Editorial Profile

NVIDIA: Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 in one narrative

Positioning, tradeoffs, and fit are consolidated into one read instead of repeating the same story across separate cards.

Selective fitCoding score 40Math score 36

Llama-3.3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1.5 is a 49B-parameter, English-centric reasoning/chat model derived from Meta’s Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct with a 128K context. It’s post-trained for agentic workflows (RAG, tool calling) via SFT across math, code, science, and multi-turn chat, followed by multiple RL stages; Reward-aware Preference Optimization (RPO) for alignment, RL with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) for step-wise reasoning, and iterative DPO to refine tool-use behavior. A distillation-driven Neural Architecture Search (“Puzzle”) replaces some attention blocks and varies FFN widths to shrink memory footprint and improve throughput, enabling single-GPU (H100/H200) deployment while preserving instruction following and CoT quality. In internal evaluations (NeMo-Skills, up to 16 runs, temp = 0.6, top_p = 0.95), the model reports strong reasoning/coding results, e.g., MATH500 pass@1 = 97.4, AIME-2024 = 87.5, AIME-2025 = 82.71, GPQA = 71.97, LiveCodeBench (24.10–25.02) = 73.58, and MMLU-Pro (CoT) = 79.53. The model targets practical inference efficiency (high tokens/s, reduced VRAM) with Transformers/vLLM support and explicit “reasoning on/off” modes (chat-first defaults, greedy recommended when disabled). Suitable for building agents, assistants, and long-context retrieval systems where balanced accuracy-to-cost and reliable tool use matter.

Identity

nvidia text-first profile

Positioning

Long-context research / Reasoning with extended context and heavy runtime.

Cost posture

Efficient spend profile. More comfortable for sustained prompt volume if the capability fit is right.

Strengths
  • Large context headroom supports repo-wide prompts and long research sessions.

Tradeoffs
  • Budget-friendly input pricing is a strength, but raw capability may vary by workload.

  • Latency profile is better for deliberate runs than rapid back-and-forth chat.

  • Current metadata points to a text-first profile rather than a broad multimodal one.

Best fit
  • Long-context summarization, repo analysis, and policy or document review.

Compare Next

Similar profiles worth opening next

nvidia

NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

Intelligence
24.3
Context
262K Tokens
Input Price
$0.06
nvidia

NVIDIA: Nemotron Nano 9B V2

Intelligence
14.8
Context
131K Tokens
Input Price
$0.04
nvidia

NVIDIA: Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL

Intelligence
10.1
Context
131K Tokens
Input Price
$0.20

Benchmarks

Grouped by job-to-be-done

Only benchmark categories with actual signal are shown. Secondary values stay as simple definitions instead of nested micro-cards.

No benchmark data is available for this model yet.

Specs & Pricing

Technical snapshot and cost posture

Specs stay neutral, pricing gets emphasis through values rather than extra containers. Raw provider internals remain in metadata at the end.

Technical snapshot
Context Window
131K Tokens
Vision
Text-first
Modalities
text->text, text
Tokenizer
Llama3
Moderation
No
Supported Parameters
frequency_penaltyinclude_reasoningmax_tokensmin_ppresence_penaltyreasoningrepetition_penaltyresponse_formatseedstoptemperaturetool_choicetoolstop_ktop_p
Input Modalities
text
Output Modalities
text
Price architecture
Input
per 1M input tokens
$0.10
Output
per 1M output tokens
$0.40
Blended
AA 3:1 mix
N/A

This model is relatively efficient on price. It is the easier fit when sustained prompt volume matters.

Metadata

Raw source tables at the end

Verification details remain available, but the page no longer forces them ahead of the editorial read.