Model profile
Mistral

Mistral: Mixtral 8x7B Instruct

Mistral: Mixtral 8x7B Instruct is a budget-priced text-first model from Mistral with partial runtime data, standard context posture, and the clearest fit around long-context research / reasoning.

Best for: Long-context research / ReasoningN/A latencyStandard contextBudget pricing
Intelligence
7.7

Benchmark blend

Coding
0.066

Dev workflow signal

Context
33K Tokens

Standard

Input Price
$0.54

Budget tier

Decision snapshot
31

Mistral: Mixtral 8x7B Instruct currently reads as a budget text-first option with standard context and a partially published runtime profile.

Overall profile
Use-case specific
Best for
Long-context research / Reasoning
Latency tier
N/A
Price tier
Budget
Source coverage
OpenRouterArtificial Analysis

Decision Strip

Decision rail before the raw tables

Core buy-side signals stay in one pass. The rest of the page expands only after intelligence, speed, context, and price are clear.

Intelligence
7.7
8

General reasoning and benchmark headroom.

Limited
Speed
N/A
N/A

Latency data is partial.

Unavailable
Context
33K Tokens
48

How much prompt and task state can stay in view.

Situational
Price
$0.54
86

$0.60 output / 1M

Efficient

Editorial Profile

Mistral: Mixtral 8x7B Instruct in one narrative

Positioning, tradeoffs, and fit are consolidated into one read instead of repeating the same story across separate cards.

Use-case specificCoding score 7Math score 30

Mixtral 8x7B Instruct is a pretrained generative Sparse Mixture of Experts, by Mistral AI, for chat and instruction use. Incorporates 8 experts (feed-forward networks) for a total of 47 billion...

Identity

Mistral text-first profile

Positioning

Long-context research / Reasoning with standard context and partially published runtime.

Cost posture

Efficient spend profile. More comfortable for sustained prompt volume if the capability fit is right.

Strengths
  • The available source data suggests a balanced profile rather than one dominant edge.

Tradeoffs
  • Budget-friendly input pricing is a strength, but raw capability may vary by workload.

  • Latency data is incomplete, so interactive responsiveness is harder to rank confidently.

  • Current metadata points to a text-first profile rather than a broad multimodal one.

  • Context window is more comfortable for focused tasks than extremely long sessions.

Best fit
  • Focused chat, retrieval-augmented flows, and narrower production tasks.

Explore Next

Similar profiles worth opening next

Mistral

Mistral: Mistral Small 4

Intelligence
27.2
Context
262K Tokens
Input Price
$0.15
Mistral

Magistral Medium 1.2

Intelligence
27.1
Context
N/A
Input Price
$2.00
Mistral

Mistral Large 3

Intelligence
22.8
Context
N/A
Input Price
$0.50

Benchmarks

Grouped by job-to-be-done

Only benchmark categories with actual signal are shown. Secondary values stay as simple definitions instead of nested micro-cards.

General intelligence

Broad reasoning, knowledge depth, and flagship benchmark posture.

Intelligence Index
7.7
MMLU Pro
38.7%
GPQA
29.2%
HLE
4.5%
Coding

Software implementation, debugging quality, and coding benchmark signal.

LiveCodeBench
0.066
SciCode
2.8%
Math

Formal reasoning, structured problem solving, and competition-style math.

AIME
0.0%
Math 500
29.9%

Specs & Pricing

Technical snapshot and cost posture

Specs stay neutral, pricing gets emphasis through values rather than extra containers. Raw provider internals remain in metadata at the end.

Technical snapshot
Context Window
33K Tokens
Vision
Text-first
Modalities
text
Tokenizer
Mistral
Max Completion
16384
Moderation
No
Supported Parameters
frequency_penaltylogit_biasmax_tokensmin_ppresence_penaltyrepetition_penaltyresponse_formatseedstoptemperaturetool_choicetoolstop_ktop_p
Input Modalities
text
Output Modalities
text
Price architecture
Input
per 1M input tokens
$0.54
Output
per 1M output tokens
$0.60
Blended
AA 3:1 mix
$0.54

This model is relatively efficient on price. It is the easier fit when sustained prompt volume matters.

Metadata

Raw source tables at the end

Verification details remain available, but the page no longer forces them ahead of the editorial read.