Model profile
liquid

LiquidAI: LFM2-8B-A1B

LiquidAI: LFM2-8B-A1B is a budget text-first model from liquid with a heavy runtime profile, standard context posture, and the clearest fit around long-context research / multimodal.

Best for: Long-context research / MultimodalHeavy latencyStandard contextBudget pricing
Intelligence
7.0

Benchmark blend

Coding
2.3

Dev workflow signal

Context
33K Tokens

Standard

Input Price
$0.00

Budget tier

Decision snapshot
32

LiquidAI: LFM2-8B-A1B currently reads as a budget text-first option with standard context and a heavy runtime profile.

Overall profile
Use-case specific
Best for
Long-context research / Multimodal
Latency tier
Heavy
Price tier
Budget
Source coverage
OpenRouterArtificial Analysis

Decision Strip

Decision rail before the raw tables

Core buy-side signals stay in one pass. The rest of the page expands only after intelligence, speed, context, and price are clear.

Intelligence
7.0
7

General reasoning and benchmark headroom.

Limited
Speed
N/A
46

Latency data is partial.

Situational
Context
33K Tokens
48

How much prompt and task state can stay in view.

Situational
Price
$0.00
86

$0.00 output / 1M

Efficient

Editorial Profile

LiquidAI: LFM2-8B-A1B in one narrative

Positioning, tradeoffs, and fit are consolidated into one read instead of repeating the same story across separate cards.

Use-case specificCoding score 2Math score 25

LFM2-8B-A1B is an efficient on-device Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model from Liquid AI’s LFM2 family, built for fast, high-quality inference on edge hardware. It uses 8.3B total parameters with only ~1.5B active per token, delivering strong performance while keeping compute and memory usage low—making it ideal for phones, tablets, and laptops.

Identity

liquid text-first profile

Positioning

Long-context research / Multimodal with standard context and heavy runtime.

Cost posture

Efficient spend profile. More comfortable for sustained prompt volume if the capability fit is right.

Strengths
  • The available source data suggests a balanced profile rather than one dominant edge.

Tradeoffs
  • Budget-friendly input pricing is a strength, but raw capability may vary by workload.

  • Latency profile is better for deliberate runs than rapid back-and-forth chat.

  • Current metadata points to a text-first profile rather than a broad multimodal one.

  • Context window is more comfortable for focused tasks than extremely long sessions.

Best fit
  • Focused chat, retrieval-augmented flows, and narrower production tasks.

Compare Next

Similar profiles worth opening next

liquid

LiquidAI: LFM2-24B-A2B

Intelligence
10.5
Context
33K Tokens
Input Price
$0.03
liquid

LiquidAI: LFM2-2.6B

Intelligence
8.0
Context
33K Tokens
Input Price
$0.00

Benchmarks

Grouped by job-to-be-done

Only benchmark categories with actual signal are shown. Secondary values stay as simple definitions instead of nested micro-cards.

General intelligence

Broad reasoning, knowledge depth, and flagship benchmark posture.

Intelligence Index
7.0
MMLU Pro
50.5%
GPQA
34.4%
HLE
4.9%
Coding

Software implementation, debugging quality, and coding benchmark signal.

Coding Index
2.3
LiveCodeBench
0.151
SciCode
6.8%
Math

Formal reasoning, structured problem solving, and competition-style math.

Math Index
25.3
AIME 2025
25.3%
Agent / tool use

Long-horizon execution quality and interactive benchmark evidence.

IFBench
26.3%
TAU2
10.5%
TerminalBench Hard
0.0%
LCR
0.0%

Specs & Pricing

Technical snapshot and cost posture

Specs stay neutral, pricing gets emphasis through values rather than extra containers. Raw provider internals remain in metadata at the end.

Technical snapshot
Context Window
33K Tokens
Vision
Text-first
Modalities
text->text, text
Tokenizer
Other
Moderation
No
Supported Parameters
frequency_penaltymax_tokensmin_ppresence_penaltyrepetition_penaltyseedstoptemperaturetop_ktop_p
Input Modalities
text
Output Modalities
text
Price architecture
Input
per 1M input tokens
$0.00
Output
per 1M output tokens
$0.00
Blended
AA 3:1 mix
$0.00

This model is relatively efficient on price. It is the easier fit when sustained prompt volume matters.

Metadata

Raw source tables at the end

Verification details remain available, but the page no longer forces them ahead of the editorial read.