Model profile
liquid
New in 2026

LiquidAI: LFM2-24B-A2B

LiquidAI: LFM2-24B-A2B is a budget text-first model from liquid with a fast runtime profile, standard context posture, and the clearest fit around long-context research / multimodal.

Best for: Long-context research / MultimodalFast latencyStandard contextBudget pricing
Intelligence
10.5

Benchmark blend

Coding
3.6

Dev workflow signal

Context
33K Tokens

Standard

Input Price
$0.03

Budget tier

Decision snapshot
44

LiquidAI: LFM2-24B-A2B currently reads as a budget text-first option with standard context and a fast runtime profile.

Overall profile
Use-case specific
Best for
Long-context research / Multimodal
Latency tier
Fast
Price tier
Budget
Source coverage
OpenRouterArtificial Analysis

Decision Strip

Decision rail before the raw tables

Core buy-side signals stay in one pass. The rest of the page expands only after intelligence, speed, context, and price are clear.

Intelligence
10.5
11

General reasoning and benchmark headroom.

Limited
Speed
251 tok/s
100

TTFT 0.26s

Above average
Context
33K Tokens
48

How much prompt and task state can stay in view.

Situational
Price
$0.03
86

$0.12 output / 1M

Efficient

Editorial Profile

LiquidAI: LFM2-24B-A2B in one narrative

Positioning, tradeoffs, and fit are consolidated into one read instead of repeating the same story across separate cards.

Use-case specificCoding score 4Math score 36

LFM2-24B-A2B is the largest model in the LFM2 family of hybrid architectures designed for efficient on-device deployment. Built as a 24B parameter Mixture-of-Experts model with only 2B active parameters per token, it delivers high-quality generation while maintaining low inference costs. The model fits within 32 GB of RAM, making it practical to run on consumer laptops and desktops without sacrificing capability.

Identity

liquid text-first profile

Positioning

Long-context research / Multimodal with standard context and fast runtime.

Cost posture

Efficient spend profile. More comfortable for sustained prompt volume if the capability fit is right.

Strengths
  • Latency and throughput look responsive enough for interactive loops.

Tradeoffs
  • Budget-friendly input pricing is a strength, but raw capability may vary by workload.

  • Current metadata points to a text-first profile rather than a broad multimodal one.

  • Context window is more comfortable for focused tasks than extremely long sessions.

Best fit
  • Focused chat, retrieval-augmented flows, and narrower production tasks.

Compare Next

Similar profiles worth opening next

liquid

LiquidAI: LFM2-2.6B

Intelligence
8.0
Context
33K Tokens
Input Price
$0.00
liquid

LiquidAI: LFM2-8B-A1B

Intelligence
7.0
Context
33K Tokens
Input Price
$0.00

Benchmarks

Grouped by job-to-be-done

Only benchmark categories with actual signal are shown. Secondary values stay as simple definitions instead of nested micro-cards.

General intelligence

Broad reasoning, knowledge depth, and flagship benchmark posture.

Intelligence Index
10.5
GPQA
47.4%
HLE
4.4%
Coding

Software implementation, debugging quality, and coding benchmark signal.

Coding Index
3.6
SciCode
10.9%
Agent / tool use

Long-horizon execution quality and interactive benchmark evidence.

IFBench
45.9%
TAU2
11.1%
TerminalBench Hard
0.0%
LCR
0.0%

Specs & Pricing

Technical snapshot and cost posture

Specs stay neutral, pricing gets emphasis through values rather than extra containers. Raw provider internals remain in metadata at the end.

Technical snapshot
Context Window
33K Tokens
Vision
Text-first
Modalities
text->text, text
Tokenizer
Other
Moderation
No
Supported Parameters
frequency_penaltylogit_biasmax_tokensmin_ppresence_penaltyrepetition_penaltystoptemperaturetop_ktop_p
Input Modalities
text
Output Modalities
text
Price architecture
Input
per 1M input tokens
$0.03
Output
per 1M output tokens
$0.12
Blended
AA 3:1 mix
$0.05

This model is relatively efficient on price. It is the easier fit when sustained prompt volume matters.

Metadata

Raw source tables at the end

Verification details remain available, but the page no longer forces them ahead of the editorial read.