Model profile
Google
New in 2026

Google: Gemma 4 31B

Google: Gemma 4 31B is a budget-priced multimodal generalist from Google with heavy runtime profile, large context posture, and the clearest fit around long-context research / multimodal.

Best for: Long-context research / MultimodalHeavy latencyLarge contextBudget pricing
Intelligence
39.2

Benchmark blend

Coding
38.7

Dev workflow signal

Context
262K Tokens

Large

Input Price
$0.00

Budget tier

Decision snapshot
56

Google: Gemma 4 31B currently reads as a budget multimodal option with large context and a heavy runtime profile.

Overall profile
Selective fit
Best for
Long-context research / Multimodal
Latency tier
Heavy
Price tier
Budget
Source coverage
OpenRouterArtificial AnalysisVision signal

Decision Strip

Decision rail before the raw tables

Core buy-side signals stay in one pass. The rest of the page expands only after intelligence, speed, context, and price are clear.

Intelligence
39.2
39

General reasoning and benchmark headroom.

Limited
Speed
35 tok/s
50

TTFT 1.27s

Situational
Context
262K Tokens
88

How much prompt and task state can stay in view.

Above average
Price
$0.00
86

$0.00 output / 1M

Efficient

Editorial Profile

Google: Gemma 4 31B in one narrative

Positioning, tradeoffs, and fit are consolidated into one read instead of repeating the same story across separate cards.

Selective fitCoding score 39Math score N/AVision enabled

Gemma 4 31B Instruct is Google DeepMind's 30.7B dense multimodal model supporting text and image input with text output. Features a 256K token context window, configurable thinking/reasoning mode, native function...

Identity

Google multimodal profile

Positioning

Long-context research / Multimodal with large context and heavy runtime.

Cost posture

Efficient spend profile. More comfortable for sustained prompt volume if the capability fit is right.

Strengths
  • Large context headroom supports repo-wide prompts and long research sessions.

  • Vision-capable routing opens up multimodal review and extraction workflows.

Tradeoffs
  • Budget-friendly input pricing is a strength, but raw capability may vary by workload.

  • Latency profile is better for deliberate runs than rapid back-and-forth chat.

Best fit
  • Image-grounded review, multimodal extraction, and UI audit workflows.

  • Long-context summarization, repo analysis, and policy or document review.

Explore Next

Similar profiles worth opening next

Google

Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Intelligence
57.2
Context
1049K Tokens
Input Price
$2.00
Google

Gemini 3 Pro Preview (high)

Intelligence
48.4
Context
N/A
Input Price
$2.00
Google

Google: Gemini 3 Flash Preview

Intelligence
46.4
Context
1049K Tokens
Input Price
$0.50

Benchmarks

Grouped by job-to-be-done

Only benchmark categories with actual signal are shown. Secondary values stay as simple definitions instead of nested micro-cards.

General intelligence

Broad reasoning, knowledge depth, and flagship benchmark posture.

Intelligence Index
39.2
GPQA
85.7%
HLE
22.7%
Coding

Software implementation, debugging quality, and coding benchmark signal.

Coding Index
38.7
SciCode
43.4%
Agent / tool use

Long-horizon execution quality and interactive benchmark evidence.

IFBench
75.6%
TAU2
59.9%
TerminalBench Hard
36.4%
LCR
62.0%

Specs & Pricing

Technical snapshot and cost posture

Specs stay neutral, pricing gets emphasis through values rather than extra containers. Raw provider internals remain in metadata at the end.

Technical snapshot
Context Window
262K Tokens
Vision
Enabled
Modalities
image, text, video
Tokenizer
Gemma
Max Completion
16384
Moderation
No
Supported Parameters
frequency_penaltyinclude_reasoninglogit_biaslogprobsmax_tokensmin_ppresence_penaltyreasoningrepetition_penaltyresponse_formatseedstopstructured_outputstemperaturetool_choicetoolstop_ktop_logprobstop_p
Input Modalities
imagetextvideo
Output Modalities
text
Price architecture
Input
per 1M input tokens
$0.00
Output
per 1M output tokens
$0.00
Blended
AA 3:1 mix
$0.00

This model is relatively efficient on price. It is the easier fit when sustained prompt volume matters.

Metadata

Raw source tables at the end

Verification details remain available, but the page no longer forces them ahead of the editorial read.