Back to LeaderboardCompare Hub
Model profile
Google

Google: Gemma 3n 4B

Google: Gemma 3n 4B is a budget-priced text-first model from Google with partial runtime data, standard context posture, and the clearest fit around long-context research.

Best for: Long-context researchN/A latencyStandard contextBudget pricing
Intelligence
N/A

Benchmark blend

Coding
N/A

Dev workflow signal

Context
33K Tokens

Standard

Input Price
$0.02

Budget tier

Decision snapshot
67

Google: Gemma 3n 4B currently reads as a budget text-first option with standard context and a partially published runtime profile.

Overall profile
Selective fit
Best for
Long-context research
Latency tier
N/A
Price tier
Budget
Source coverage
OpenRouter
Open compare hubSee leaderboard

Decision Strip

Decision rail before the raw tables

Core buy-side signals stay in one pass. The rest of the page expands only after intelligence, speed, context, and price are clear.

Intelligence
N/A
N/A

General reasoning and benchmark headroom.

Unavailable
Speed
N/A
N/A

Latency data is partial.

Unavailable
Context
33K Tokens
48

How much prompt and task state can stay in view.

Situational
Price
$0.02
86

$0.04 output / 1M

Efficient

Editorial Profile

Google: Gemma 3n 4B in one narrative

Positioning, tradeoffs, and fit are consolidated into one read instead of repeating the same story across separate cards.

Selective fitCoding score N/AMath score N/A

Gemma 3n E4B-it is optimized for efficient execution on mobile and low-resource devices, such as phones, laptops, and tablets. It supports multimodal inputs—including text, visual data, and audio—enabling diverse tasks...

Identity

Google text-first profile

Positioning

Long-context research with standard context and partially published runtime.

Cost posture

Efficient spend profile. More comfortable for sustained prompt volume if the capability fit is right.

Strengths

  • The available source data suggests a balanced profile rather than one dominant edge.

Tradeoffs

  • Budget-friendly input pricing is a strength, but raw capability may vary by workload.

  • Latency data is incomplete, so interactive responsiveness is harder to rank confidently.

  • Current metadata points to a text-first profile rather than a broad multimodal one.

  • Context window is more comfortable for focused tasks than extremely long sessions.

Best fit

  • Focused chat, retrieval-augmented flows, and narrower production tasks.

Explore Next

Similar profiles worth opening next

Google

Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Intelligence
57.2
Context
1049K Tokens
Input Price
$2.00
Open profile
Google

Gemini 3 Pro Preview (high)

Intelligence
48.4
Context
N/A
Input Price
$2.00
Open profile
Google

Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Reasoning)

Intelligence
46.4
Context
N/A
Input Price
$0.50
Open profile

Benchmarks

Grouped by job-to-be-done

Only benchmark categories with actual signal are shown. Secondary values stay as simple definitions instead of nested micro-cards.

No benchmark data is available for this model yet.

Specs & Pricing

Technical snapshot and cost posture

Specs stay neutral, pricing gets emphasis through values rather than extra containers. Raw provider internals remain in metadata at the end.

Technical snapshot
Context Window
33K Tokens
Vision
Text-first
Modalities
text
Tokenizer
Other
Moderation
No
Supported Parameters
frequency_penaltylogit_biasmax_tokensmin_ppresence_penaltyrepetition_penaltystoptemperaturetop_ktop_p
Input Modalities
text
Output Modalities
text
Price architecture
Input
per 1M input tokens
$0.02
Output
per 1M output tokens
$0.04
Blended
AA 3:1 mix
N/A

This model is relatively efficient on price. It is the easier fit when sustained prompt volume matters.

Metadata

Raw source tables at the end

Verification details remain available, but the page no longer forces them ahead of the editorial read.