Model profile
google

Google: Gemma 2 9B

Google: Gemma 2 9B is a budget text-first model from google with a heavy runtime profile, compact context posture, and the clearest fit around reasoning / coding.

Best for: Reasoning / CodingHeavy latencyCompact contextBudget pricing
Intelligence
N/A

Benchmark blend

Coding
N/A

Dev workflow signal

Context
8K Tokens

Compact

Input Price
$0.03

Budget tier

Decision snapshot
48

Google: Gemma 2 9B currently reads as a budget text-first option with compact context and a heavy runtime profile.

Overall profile
Use-case specific
Best for
Reasoning / Coding
Latency tier
Heavy
Price tier
Budget
Source coverage
OpenRouter

Decision Strip

Decision rail before the raw tables

Core buy-side signals stay in one pass. The rest of the page expands only after intelligence, speed, context, and price are clear.

Intelligence
N/A
44

General reasoning and benchmark headroom.

Situational
Speed
N/A
46

Latency data is partial.

Situational
Context
8K Tokens
28

How much prompt and task state can stay in view.

Limited
Price
$0.03
86

$0.09 output / 1M

Efficient

Editorial Profile

Google: Gemma 2 9B in one narrative

Positioning, tradeoffs, and fit are consolidated into one read instead of repeating the same story across separate cards.

Use-case specificCoding score 40Math score 36

Gemma 2 9B by Google is an advanced, open-source language model that sets a new standard for efficiency and performance in its size class. Designed for a wide variety of tasks, it empowers developers and researchers to build innovative applications, while maintaining accessibility, safety, and cost-effectiveness. See the [launch announcement](https://blog.google/technology/developers/google-gemma-2/) for more details. Usage of Gemma is subject to Google's [Gemma Terms of Use](https://ai.google.dev/gemma/terms).

Identity

google text-first profile

Positioning

Reasoning / Coding with compact context and heavy runtime.

Cost posture

Efficient spend profile. More comfortable for sustained prompt volume if the capability fit is right.

Strengths
  • The available source data suggests a balanced profile rather than one dominant edge.

Tradeoffs
  • Budget-friendly input pricing is a strength, but raw capability may vary by workload.

  • Latency profile is better for deliberate runs than rapid back-and-forth chat.

  • Current metadata points to a text-first profile rather than a broad multimodal one.

  • Context window is more comfortable for focused tasks than extremely long sessions.

Best fit
  • Focused chat, retrieval-augmented flows, and narrower production tasks.

Compare Next

Similar profiles worth opening next

google

Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Intelligence
57.2
Context
1049K Tokens
Input Price
$2.00
google

Google: Gemini 3 Flash Preview

Intelligence
46.4
Context
1049K Tokens
Input Price
$0.50
google

Google: Gemini 3 Pro Preview

Intelligence
41.3
Context
1049K Tokens
Input Price
$2.00

Benchmarks

Grouped by job-to-be-done

Only benchmark categories with actual signal are shown. Secondary values stay as simple definitions instead of nested micro-cards.

No benchmark data is available for this model yet.

Specs & Pricing

Technical snapshot and cost posture

Specs stay neutral, pricing gets emphasis through values rather than extra containers. Raw provider internals remain in metadata at the end.

Technical snapshot
Context Window
8K Tokens
Vision
Text-first
Modalities
text->text, text
Tokenizer
Gemini
Moderation
No
Supported Parameters
frequency_penaltymax_tokenspresence_penaltyrepetition_penaltytemperaturetop_ktop_p
Input Modalities
text
Output Modalities
text
Price architecture
Input
per 1M input tokens
$0.03
Output
per 1M output tokens
$0.09
Blended
AA 3:1 mix
N/A

This model is relatively efficient on price. It is the easier fit when sustained prompt volume matters.

Metadata

Raw source tables at the end

Verification details remain available, but the page no longer forces them ahead of the editorial read.