Back to LeaderboardCompare Hub
Model profile
Anthropic

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast)

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast) is a premium-priced multimodal generalist from Anthropic with partial runtime data, large context posture, and the clearest fit around long-context research / multimodal.

Best for: Long-context research / MultimodalN/A latencyLarge contextPremium pricing
Vision modelsAgentic models
Intelligence
N/A

Benchmark blend

Coding
N/A

Dev workflow signal

Context
1000K Tokens

Large

Input Price
$30.00

Premium tier

Decision snapshot
59

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast) currently reads as a premium multimodal option with large context and a partially published runtime profile.

Overall profile
Selective fit
Best for
Long-context research / Multimodal
Latency tier
N/A
Price tier
Premium
Source coverage
OpenRouterVision signal
Open compare hubSee leaderboard

Decision Strip

Decision rail before the raw tables

Core buy-side signals stay in one pass. The rest of the page expands only after intelligence, speed, context, and price are clear.

Intelligence
N/A
N/A

General reasoning and benchmark headroom.

Unavailable
Speed
N/A
N/A

Latency data is partial.

Unavailable
Context
1000K Tokens
100

How much prompt and task state can stay in view.

Above average
Price
$30.00
18

$150.00 output / 1M

Premium

Editorial Profile

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast) in one narrative

Positioning, tradeoffs, and fit are consolidated into one read instead of repeating the same story across separate cards.

Selective fitCoding score N/AMath score N/AVision enabled

Fast-mode variant of [Opus 4.6](/anthropic/claude-opus-4.6) - identical capabilities with higher output speed at premium 6x pricing. Learn more in Anthropic's docs: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/build-with-claude/fast-mode

Identity

Anthropic multimodal profile

Positioning

Long-context research / Multimodal with large context and partially published runtime.

Cost posture

Premium spend profile. Best when the upside justifies tighter budget control.

Strengths

  • Large context headroom supports repo-wide prompts and long research sessions.

  • Vision-capable routing opens up multimodal review and extraction workflows.

Tradeoffs

  • Pricing sits in premium territory, so bulk usage needs tighter cost controls.

  • Latency data is incomplete, so interactive responsiveness is harder to rank confidently.

Best fit

  • Image-grounded review, multimodal extraction, and UI audit workflows.

  • Long-context summarization, repo analysis, and policy or document review.

Explore Next

Similar profiles worth opening next

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)

Intelligence
53.0
Context
N/A
Input Price
$5.00
Open profile
Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)

Intelligence
51.7
Context
N/A
Input Price
$3.00
Open profile
Anthropic

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5

Intelligence
49.7
Context
200K Tokens
Input Price
$5.00
Open profile

Benchmarks

Grouped by job-to-be-done

Only benchmark categories with actual signal are shown. Secondary values stay as simple definitions instead of nested micro-cards.

No benchmark data is available for this model yet.

Specs & Pricing

Technical snapshot and cost posture

Specs stay neutral, pricing gets emphasis through values rather than extra containers. Raw provider internals remain in metadata at the end.

Technical snapshot
Context Window
1000K Tokens
Vision
Enabled
Modalities
image, text
Tokenizer
Claude
Max Completion
128000
Moderation
Yes
Supported Parameters
include_reasoningmax_tokensreasoningresponse_formatstopstructured_outputstemperaturetool_choicetoolstop_pverbosity
Input Modalities
imagetext
Output Modalities
text
Price architecture
Input
per 1M input tokens
$30.00
Output
per 1M output tokens
$150.00
Blended
AA 3:1 mix
N/A

This model trades into premium territory. It makes sense when capability upside matters more than raw volume efficiency.

OR Web Search Price
$0.0100
OR Cache Read
$0.00
OR Cache Write
$0.00

Metadata

Raw source tables at the end

Verification details remain available, but the page no longer forces them ahead of the editorial read.